A formal mathematical setting for a quantum system is that of a Hilbert spaceH, which is (for us90) just a vector space along with an inner product.
Given a Hilbert space corresponding to our system, the result of any preparation of the system is then represented by some unit vector ∣ψ⟩∈H, and any test is represented by some other unit vector ∣e⟩∈H.
The inner product of these two vectors, ⟨e∣ψ⟩, gives the probability amplitude that an object prepared in state ∣ψ⟩ will pass a test for being in state ∣e⟩.
As always, probabilities are obtained by squaring absolute values of probability amplitudes:
∣⟨e∣ψ⟩∣2=⟨ψ∣e⟩⟨e∣ψ⟩.
After the test, in which the object was found to be in state ∣e⟩, say, the object forgets about its previous state ∣ψ⟩ and is, indeed, actually now in state ∣e⟩.
That is, if we immediately measure the object again, we will find it to still be in state ∣e⟩ with probability 1.
This is the mysterious quantum collapse, which we will further discuss later on.
A more complete test involves multiple states ek that form an orthonormal basis {∣e1⟩,…,∣en⟩}.
These states are perfectly distinguishable from each other: the condition ⟨ek∣el⟩=δkl implies that a quantum system prepared in state ∣el⟩ will never be found in state ∣ek⟩ (unless k=l).
The probability amplitude that the system in state ∣ψ⟩ will be found in state ∣ek⟩ is ⟨ek∣ψ⟩ and, given that the vectors ∣ek⟩ span the whole vector space, the system will be always found in one of the basis states, whence
k∑∣⟨ek∣ψ⟩∣2=1.
As a result:
A complete measurement in quantum theory is determined by the choice of an orthonormal basis {∣ei⟩} in H, and every such basis (in principle) represents a possible complete measurement.
As mentioned in Section 0.3, we only work with finite dimensional vector spaces, and it is a very convenient fact that any finite dimensional inner product space is automatically a Hilbert space.↩︎